29 April 2009

Links of the Day

Visualizing the Grid

This is kind of fun to play with. I am mildly entertained by the fact that if you switch it to power plants, and then coal, you can find my hometown. There was a major plant right next to my elementary school. We liked to joke, growing up, that this was why there were (quite literally) mutant insects in everyone's basements. It was undoubtedly the source of the overwhelmingly bad smells that occasionally permeated that side of town. And it was without much doubt the source of the high asthma rate in the area.

Hurray for electric.

In other news, this is kind of fun (and kitsch): The Recycled Cardboard Computer Case

Not to mention...

the other entries for Inhabit's Greener Gadgets competition.

Though in the remarks on the Cardboard Computer Case they really hit the nail on the head- yes, electronics are designed to have a short lifespan. That's how electronics companies make money. So the real question is maybe which is more important- the profits of the electronics companies or the amount of waste produced by the constant "updates" of our electronic devices? I refer you back to Last Year's Model.

Of course, it probably depends on who you're asking.





Read more...

27 April 2009

Earth Day '09

The winners for the 2009 George Gets Ingenious competition was also announced at Earth Day. Congratulations to Nicolas Bash '10! You can view his entry and all the other great ideas for sustainability here.

And now, for your viewing pleasure, gratuitous puppy photos from this year's Earth Day and Mutt Strut in Fountain Park. To see the rest of the photos, check out the CES website. Click to enlarge! And please excuse blogger's inability to line up pictures.





















Read more...

23 April 2009

Last Year's Model

A great cause, and an adorable website.

Last Year's Model

You can also join their cause on facebook. The idea is to pledge to keep your old electronics for as long as they're still working- instead of constantly updating to whatever the newest fad may be. Simple!







Read more...

22 April 2009

Happy Earth Day!

Happy Earth Day everyone!

In celebration there will be local foods featured in the dining hall tonight, from our very own Homestead Farm, located in Millington, MD. This may be a small selection, but expect to see local foods more often in the dining hall, especially in the fall when we move back into Hodson.

Woo!







Read more...

21 April 2009

Thrifty Belle O' The Ball

If you missed the Alpha Chi Omega dress drive on April 4th, you need not fret! There are plenty of other ways you can donate your old prom (or Birthday Ball, or formal, or homecoming) dresses and ensure that they're put to good use.

The Priceless Gown Project is a Baltimore organization dedicated to providing prom dresses for high school students who can't afford to buy their own. They accept clean, lightly-used gowns, and then set up an annual boutique for local girls to pick out free prom outfits. While this year's dress drive and boutique are now closed, the organization will soon be collecting more gowns for the 2010 prom season.

Other organizations across the country host similar projects. Here are a few along the East Coast:
Connecticut: Princess and the Prom
Massachusetts: Fairy GodMother Project of Massachusetts
New Jersey: Catherine's Closet, Inc.
New York: Gowns for Girls, Operation Fairy Dust, The Cinderella Project
Pennsylvania: Fairy Godmothers, Inc.


Read more...

20 April 2009

How Long Will it Last?

How Long Will it Last?

This is just fascinating...


Read more...

19 April 2009

Green Elitism

Is Rural Green Living an Elitist Illusion?

I didn’t just post this because they use a Monty Python picture in the article. I swear.

No, I was actually just talking about this recently with some friends (my friends are so nerdy that we typically sit around talking about things like the true definition of sustainability). Hybrid cars are great and all, but I can’t afford one. Most people I know can’t afford one. I typically use the word “inaccessible” for most “green” innovations. Many argue that new green technologies will eventually trickle down, but I honestly don’t think we’ve got that kind of time. Products trickle down as newer, better innovations come along, but that can take decades- and it means that there will be even more sustainable products on the market, leaving those with the least money using outdated, inefficient models.

Additionally, how green is it if the majority of the population simply can’t afford it? It means only a small percentage can go green, leaving the rest of us… well, not green.


This article presents a good point, and turns it about a bit. Not only can “green” products be labeled elitist, marketed as they are to people with money (Whole Foods is a great example of this. I dare you to find a Whole Foods in a depressed area), but those toting the green products tend to look down on those who are lacking. There’s certainly a “greener-than-thou” attitude among a lot of the environmental advocates, comparing notes on whose wardrobe is more organic, who has the newest, most efficient car, who has the fanciest fair trade furniture. And that’s great and all. It’s better than all of those same people driving gas guzzling sports cars. But what about the part of the population who doesn’t have the disposable income for that sort of shopping?

That’s where you encounter what this article calls “the rural poor,” and by extension, I’d imagine, the same group in urban areas. When people have less money (and I think college students, at least the ones I hung around, sometimes have a similar experience, even if it’s temporary), they become very innovative in their attempts to cut out expenses. For those in rural areas, especially in the UK, which this article refers to, they’ve likely been practicing sustainable methods for centuries. A hybrid car would be completely ridiculous in that situation- as would a reusable grocery bag, or organic cotton shoes, or any other of the trappings of middle class greenism.

It makes you, I think, really question what sustainability is. I personally don’t think it has anything to do with products whatsoever. Some may be “greener” than others, and may be improvements in terms of damage done to the environment- but if we’re really going to be sustainable, I think improvements are just not going to cut it. We need to rethink how we approach everything in our lives, and that, I believe, means cutting out the consumerism all together. What’s more sustainable, after all- solar panels, or not using any electric at all? Oh, I know how most people will react to this- I get labeled a luddite all the time- but I’m not suggesting we all go without electric, as I’ve said before. I’m just suggesting we take a long, hard look at the things we call “green” and ask if they’re really helping save the environment, or if they’re really just helping us feel better about ourselves- while we maintain the exact same lifestyle that got us into this mess originally.


Read more...

17 April 2009

Flashbacks to Freshman Year

This is just fun:
Recycled Runway Collection

We used to do this in fashion school. Intro Fashion, your first class, involved making a dress out of anything other than fabric (these would not pass). The most beautiful I ever saw (and the most controversial) was a gorgeous full length evening gown out of Kotex pads (using the blue wrappers for trim). I wish I had a picture of it.

PS: If you haven't figured it out yet, I didn't go to Washington College. Just a sidenote.







Read more...

New Soap, New Concept

New Soap, Old Bottle

Now this in an interesting concept. Companies will on occasion sell refills to their products, in those big bottles that are always inexplicably on the top shelf so you risk knocking yourself over the head when you pull one down. (Superfresh also keeps the Kashi crackers on a shelf I can barely reach, and I really think this is explicitly to make my life more difficult).

Anyway, the concept of New Soap, Old Bottle is to cleanse and reuse old soda and beer bottles by filling them with new soap- from companies like Windex, 409, and Dawn. They also, as far as I can tell, have their own line of “Super Green” cleaning supplies, which you can also order on their website.


Now, I would generally prefer that the entire line was the “Super Green”, and they didn’t even fuss with nasty substances like Windex (which I personally can’t use- it sets off my asthma)- but I suppose this is part of their ploy to get people to buy into the concept. Many people (myself included) are suspicious of green lines of cleaning supplies, as there are a lot of brands that claim to be all natural or green, but who may or may not be able to substantiate those claims. (Clorox? Green? Come on.) So when introducing a new concept, especially something people might be a little suspect of (old bottles), it probably makes sense to break them in slowly, with products they’re familiar with.

So, kudos to them for innovation. The idea of reusing old bottles by putting new tops on them isn't exactly new, but the idea of putting new soap in them and packaging it up all nice is rather unique. I will continue to make my own cleaning products out of vinegar and baking soda, and put them in reusable bottles that I thieved from the trash (or my conventional cleaning product using parents), but for those of you who choose not to take the time, or simply prefer conventional cleaning products, check them out. They also sell spray tops and that sort of thing so you can make your own reusable bottles at home.


Read more...

16 April 2009

101st Post!

Loyal Followers,

I've just realized we hit 100 posts! Somehow I have a hard time believing that, but I suppose, since I started this blog during George Goes Green last year (and it is that time again) it has been about one year- and 100 posts in one year is a pretty respectable number.

In celebration, here is a fun, non-rant link about bicycles, which I love dearly. Maybe we should start collecting the recycling on campus by bike. Extraordinary Loads on Ordinary Bikes

Also, please excuse some temporary messiness while I redesign the look of the blog.

Thanks for reading!

Green Georgia


Read more...

14 April 2009

Parrot Sweaters

Let's admit it: There are very few things you can do with old socks. Sure, you can use them as tiny dust rags or donate them to the Red Hot Chili Peppers, but wouldn't it be nice if you could put them to more useful use?

Best Friends Animal Society provides a solution to this conundrum. As America's largest no-kill domestic pet and wildlife sanctuary, the Kanab, Utah sanctuary has taken in more than a dozen parrots from neglectful and abusive owners. Many of them, according to the organization's web site, suffer from anxiety disorders that cause them to pluck their feathers, leaving them feather-less (bald?) and less able to regulate their body temperature. Parrot sweaters--either knitted or crocheted by hand or created from thick, used socks--protect the birds from fluctuations in temperature and distract them from causing harm to themselves. Specialists at the sanctuary also say they're intellectually stimulating.

Because Best Friends is a non-profit, they are always eager to accept donations from anyone kind enough to help them out. So any lightly-used adult mid-calf socks that you could spare would most likely be put to good use. Just contact chandra@bestfriends.org if you want more information.


Read more...

13 April 2009

The Bottled Water Debate

I’ve recently been privy to a series of emails from various college dining services purchasers and the like, all debating the relative merits of banning bottled water from campus, as they call it. To be more accurate, they should say, to stop selling bottled water in campus retail locations. There’s no way they can “ban” bottled water from being brought onto campus from outside sources.

To me, this should be a no brainer. Bottled water is one of the most wasteful inventions in history. Americans throw away sixty million water bottles PER DAY in the U.S. Sixty MILLION. Take a moment to picture that. And arguments that recycling can eliminate this problem are a load of BS. Barely a quarter of the bottles produced in this country are recycled. The obvious and very simple alternative to this extraordinary quantity of waste is to stop selling bottled water. However, the industry, including a number of college retailers, argue that they wouldn’t stock bottled water if people weren’t buying it. However, this is another ridiculous argument, and one that you hear to justify everything from fast food to underpriced sweatshop clothing- “well, people are buying it.” People would probably buy crack if you started selling it in retail locations, but you don’t see anyone doing that, now do you?


To an extent, there is some validity to this argument. People ARE buying all the shit out there on the market, and the people selling it are making money off it- so they keep selling it. McDonald’s would not continue to exist if it weren’t raking in billions of dollars every year. But who’s to blame, really? You can blame consumers for being uninformed and not thinking about their decisions. You can blame the industries for aggressive marketing, especially to children. Hell, you can blame every aspect of this society for making people into consumers, and leaving them with no choice except to be slavishly dependent on what they can purchase- and for being driven to look for the lowest price out of necessity. If we still knew how to grow our own food, and still had access to clean water, things like fast food and bottled water wouldn’t even be issues.

But we are currently trapped within the confines of a consumer culture (for the time being), and that leaves the question: do we stop selling bottled water, or continue in this vein? Stopping selling water would clearly eliminate an enormous amount of waste. But if colleges stopped selling bottled water, they would be required to install more water fountains, so that students continue to have access to water- and that, and this is the key, costs money and does not make any profit for the college.

The various people at other colleges who have weighed in on this like to laundry list excuses like, “tap water isn’t as high quality as bottled,” which is patently not true in most cases (tap water is more strictly regulated than bottled, the problem comes with poor plumbing at the college itself, which is fixable), and rambling about how they only want to offer the highest quality products to their students. I honestly would not be so irritated if they would just come right out and say they don’t want to lose money.

No, if they really cared about students they would be more interested in providing the cleanest water possible- in a form far more accessible than expensive bottled water, ie public fountains at more regular intervals. And if they cared about the environment, it wouldn’t even be a question. But, like people everywhere, they refuse to acknowledge their real motivations- instead attacking the environmentalists for not also attacking bottled soda (uh?).

It comes down to the same thing that is ALWAYS an issue, and is at the heart of every environmental argument: if we all had access to clean water, would bottled water be in any way successful? Is it within our rights as human beings to continue to access one of the basic necessities of life without paying an arm and a leg for it? It hearkens back to the public bathroom issue. The trend right now is to make you pay for everything, basic necessity or not. The perfect consumer is one that doesn’t have any other options.


Read more...

07 April 2009

Green Blowjobs

EcoGeek - Interview with Paolo Bacigalupi

This guy is just fantastic. I've largely stopped reading scifi in recent years, but scifi authors generally have the ability to look sharply at our own culture by exaggerating it and setting it just far apart that we can look at it from a perspective we can rarely turn on ourselves. Ursula LeGuin is a great example of that. I haven't read any of this guy's books, but from what he says in his interview, I think I'm going to have to. I'm going to be eternally indebted to him for inventing, to my knowledge, the term "green blowjob." That just about sums up my opinion of most of the green products being pandered to us on the market these days.


I just want to quote this section:

"One of the things I dislike intensely about technological fixes is that they often involve payment in order to replicate a natural service that once was provided free of charge by nature. Don't have clean water? One techno-fix is a water filter. Let's give a huge shout out to Brita filters, right? But then we all have to buy one.

"In India, middle-class households all have water filters... the poor go without. The other option would be to protect our water sources. But that's just not sexy. Using a technology almost automatically means we have to hire and pay a technology creator, which in turns creates an economic interest that does not actually care to remedy the core problem. If I sell water filters, I'm not going to be interested in clean water for all. That would kill my market of clean water for the ones who want to buy it from me. Once there's an economic interest, you end up with corporations lobbying tooth and nail to keep us from simply taking the most simple long-range planning steps.

"So no, basically, I think trying to find another tool to fix what we've already done with our tools, generally works out poorly. This has partly to do with the narrow way we approach environmental problems and our lack of foresight over cascade effects. And partly from seeing how talk of techno-fixes almost always defaults to a circle-jerk that's really focused on how we can keep enabling our ongoing stupidity. Another drink doesn't help an alcoholic, another toy doesn't fix our environmental problems. Either we deal with root causes, or we pay down the road. None of the ways we make, sell or trade objects are sustainable. The longer we deny it, the harder it will hit us."

-Paolo Bacigalupi

Amen to that. Nothing to add.


Read more...

02 April 2009

Burger King Attempts to Conquer the World

Whopper Virgin Documentary

Usually I post things on here that I like. This is something that makes me want to go on a very, very angry rampage. If I were the sort of person who made moralistic judgments, I would be doing so right now- but instead I will go through it point by point. Watch the video first, or this won’t make any sense.

One- This is a very cleverly designed ad campaign. Notice how they select out the few people who, most likely out of context, seem to be friendly with the advertisers, inviting them back to their villages, etc. I imagine just as many people flat out told them no, or spit the burger right back out, or told them to get the hell out. But they chose not to show you that, of course.

Two- The whole premise- that there are very few people in the world who haven’t tried hamburgers, and that this is a wonderous thing, going around and introducing hamburgers to the “whopper virgins” of the world, is presumptuous and condescending. Thank the stars there are still people in the world who have never eaten a hamburger. The implication by Burger King that they are bringing enlightenment to the world in the form of the whopper is a disgusting example of our culture’s mindset that our way is the only way, and those who haven’t yet been exposed to it should be brought around to see the light.

Three- This is demonstrated in how they focus on the way most of the people filmed are unsure as to how to approach a burger- whether to take it apart or cut it up or what- as if this is quaint and adorable in the way a very small child tries to figure out how to use an unfamiliar object.

Four- The simple fact that they developed a portable Burger King grill to take on the road, and complained about not being able to plug it in at many of their stops- well, another example of condescension. I’m surprised a lot of people even had electric outlets to start with, and the fact that Burger King felt the need to go into their communities, disturbing their way of life, and plug in an “official” Burger King grill- I have no words.

Five- In the same vein, it’s interesting that they chose locations as close to Burger King restaurants as possible- clearly this has nothing to do with the fact that Burger King has so saturated the market that they have very little room for expansion, and are looking for ways to bring their products to the last reaches of the earth, because we have a growth economy and this is the only way to increase profit.

Six- Which is really what it comes down to: how can you increase profits when there are already more burgers in existence than people, in theory, could legitimately eat? The advertising expense for this ad campaign must have been tremendous, and you know Burger King wouldn’t put out that kind of money if they didn’t expect some kind of return.

Seven- Overall, I find the entire campaign distasteful and disrespectful to traditional cultures to an extreme. I cheered when they asked one man if he liked the whopper better than seal meat, and he answered that he preferred seal meat. Good for him. Homogeneity in food is one of the biggest causes of global issues- poverty, environmental destruction, destruction of indigenous ways of life, I’ve covered this on this blog many times over. Not to mention that the reason whoppers all taste the same is that the taste is manufactured in a plant, out of chemical ingredients, and basted over the meat to give it that familiar flavor. Nothing to do with the actual meat, which probably tastes like cardboard. At least that’s how I remember fast food burgers in my memory- but it’s been at least ten years since I quit eating them.


Read more...

01 April 2009

Deadline Extended - Please Enter Now! 60 Seconds or Less Video Festival

Showcase the work you’ve already done in classes! Make a trailer for a longer video assignment, re-edit something that’s over a minute - we want to make sure your work gets seen because we know there are great projects out there on campus now!

(And - if you think you can turn something out quickly, why not make that idea into reality or turn in another quick project?)

You now have until Monday, April 6th at 12:00 pm to turn your videotapes in to Nancy Cross in the Miller Library (Lower Level.) Don’t miss this great opportunity to show your friends what you’ve created this year.

There’s still a chance to win a digital video camera or hundreds of dollars worth of prizes! If no one enters, no one wins and we’ve only got five entries total at this point. Still lots of chances to come away with something.

The Awards Presentation Reception and Ceremony will be April 7th and will kick off at 6:00 pm with wine, cheese, fruit and candies from around the world in Toll Atrium. The video presentation and awards ceremony will start at 7:00 pm in Litrenta.

Hope to see your entries soon (full rules at www.wcmc.tv) and see you in Toll!


Read more...

George Goes Green! Again.

Once again, it is time for our annual George Goes Green marathon! As George Goes Green is now practiced all year round, and not just in April, we've made this year's theme: An Action a Day Keeps Global Warming at Bay. On the George Goes Green website you can find a calendar with tips and suggestions to help make every day a green day. We'll also be posting tips, pictures and video here on the blog throughout the month of April.

This year we also are leaving behind the energy competitions of the past. As this is the fourth year of George Goes Green, we figure you've got the idea by now and should be saving energy ALL year round. Instead, we're focusing on individual actions and innovative solutions to sustainability, through a series of events (including our sustainability workshop, which I will blog about at some point) and the annual George Gets Ingenious competition. Here is your chance to win $250.

No, for real. YOU CAN WIN $250. I know I could use that much.

The rules and guidelines are posted here for your edification: click here

Photos, suggestions, and other submissions can be sent to tholste2@washcoll.edu. For Washington College students, faculty and staff ONLY please.


Read more...

Spring Break '09

I awoke to the sound of rain softly beating against the side of the tent. The sides of the canvas were damp, but I barely felt it, wrapped tightly in my sleeping bag. Somewhere outside I could hear a vulture rustling it’s wings, most likely eyeing the camp, trying to determine if it was safe to approach. I glanced up at the tent window, and saw that the sun had not yet risen. The sky was still a solid, deep gray.

Eventually the sun would crest the edge of the beach, washing the sky with a light pink haze, edged in brilliant red. By the time it had moved beyond the tops of the palms, we would all be awake, perched on the picnic tables eating bagels and slathering on sunscreen before the day’s activities. It’s not a normal college schedule, rising at dawn and falling asleep shortly after dark, but when the days are filled with volunteering, canoeing, swimming, and hiking, it’s best to get an early start, and by the time the sun sinks below the ocean and the moon has risen to bathe the campsite in pearly white, all we can think about is sleep.


Each day brought a new adventure: whether meeting a panther face to face (literally), and learning that panthers, cougars, and mountain lions are in fact the same species (who knew?), or clearing brush to keep a trail clear for other explorers, each day of volunteering exposed students to the ins and outs of the Everglades ecosystems, especially with an up close look at what doesn’t belong- the tigers, snakes, monkeys and other exotic animals at the Everglades Outpost, rescued after escaping from research facilities or being abandoned by people who thought keeping a Bengal tiger for a pet would be a good idea, or the invasive species that plague the parks and choke out native plants.

Students also entered the Everglades themselves, getting as close as possible to the water while canoeing through mangrove tunnels, feet away from alligators, wading birds, and the other denizens of the swamps and waterways that make up the 1.5 million acres of the Everglades National Park, where we spent most of our time. A night hike during the full moon brought us within range of a group of feeding alligators, animals which look like nothing so much as baking logs during the day, but which come out in numbers in the cool of night to thrash through the swamp, snapping their jaws on unfortunate fish with a sound like a trunk closing. It is a rare group that gets to see a “feeding frenzy”- and a sight not quickly forgotten.

On another day we were able to get even closer to the wildlife, spending an afternoon on a beach in Key Largo, resting before the long drive back to Maryland, soaking in the sun, and snorkeling in the protected bay, which sheltered numerous fish and crabs, which could be seen hiding among the roots of the mangrove trees. The sky remained a perfect, incandescent blue throughout our trip- the temperature a perfect 81∞ each day, and bliss to our group, having just come from the melting snows and blustering winds in Maryland. An afternoon spent lying under the shade of a palm, listening to the waves brush softly against the beach, and watching wisps of cloud skirt across the sky, drifting in and out of sleep, was a perfect conclusion to a week spent out-of-doors, as near to the land as possible, without cell phones (no reception) and only about two watches between the lot of us, telling time by the angle of the sun and our own growing familiarity with the Florida skies.

The Everglades are a lesson in ecology. The climate is somewhat different from what we have here in Maryland: only two seasons, wet and dry. We were fortunate to visit during the dry season, when there are fewer bugs, almost no rain, and a higher likelihood of seeing animals, as they are bunched together around the few remaining large pools of water. The Everglades itself is actually a very, very slow moving river- 60 miles wide and 100 miles long, twice as wide as the Bay but half as long. During the wet season, May through November, the area floods to form acres of wetlands and swamp, which serve an important role in buffering Florida from hurricanes and flooding. Much of the damage done to Florida by storm systems in past years has been the result of the destruction of many of the wetlands that once absorbed the flooding caused by storms. The park itself is protected under a number of preservation efforts- but this doesn’t account for the encroaching development that threatens coastal regions elsewhere in Florida and around the world.

On the last night before we returned to Maryland, we came back to our campsite tired and sunburned, to find the site surprisingly dark. All week the moon had been so bright we had rarely needed lanterns to find our way around, but on this night, the moon hadn’t yet risen, and we could barely see our tents as we stumbled out of the vans. A few steps out of the parking lot, however, and we all stopped dead in our tracks. Without the moon, the sky was overflowing with more stars than most of us had seen in years, or in some cases, ever. The Milky Way was clearly visible, as were thousands upon thousands of stars we could only imagine even in a place with as little light pollution as the Eastern Shore. A group of us, without any planning or discussion, sprawled out in the grass to look up at the breathtaking span, sharing stories about constellations we could identify, and making up our own when we ran out of ones we knew. One girl pointed out that the light coming to us so strongly had been traveling for thousands of years to get here- and in many cases, the stars that originally gave off the light had at this point burned out. Looking up at the sky, which wrapped around us in an enormous dome unobstructed by any building or even trees, it was easy to feel small, a tiny speck in a vast expanse, and at the same time immensely connected to it all: to the stars, and the palms, and the cry of a heron somewhere in the night; to the alligators, and the flowing river where it met the sea within view of our campsite, and to one another, lying on our backs in the grass.

View photos of our trip here.


Read more...